The one thing silly Marge Menge doesn't mention in her silly little paper about the Beach/Casino

Marge's paper has a lot of words but the most important material fact is not even mentioned. Commissioner McVoy is opposed to the secrecy needed in the "Invitation to Negotiate Process" (ITN) concerning the Lake Worth Beach/Casino. This is the beginning where ideas are discussed: there is no planning. There isn't anything to submit to the City yet.

McVoy was fine with process. He voted for it; the vote was unanimous.

McVoy was "for it before he was against it". I'll translate for you, Marge: "McVoy was for the ITN process before he was against it".

From the Palm Beach Post:

     The secrecy bothers McVoy —even though he voted for it
     Last week, McVoy says he didn’t know the ITN would be so hush-hush: At the time he voted, McVoy said its description was “fuzzy…I would not say it was very adequately explained.”

McVoy has a PhD and claims he was "fuzzy". Marge, how could your silly little paper not mention the most material fact in this entire debate?

This following letters by James Tebbe and Connie Stahl do more to explain what is happening than anything Marge has written on this subject: