Friday, June 15, 2007

WOW - Technology coming down the pike!

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Pics from Beach Lawsuit "Press Conference" on Steps of City Hall


Members of the Cabal behind the Beach Lawsuit and Petition Drive:

Atlantis Resident - Dennis Dorsey$$

Atlantis Resident - Chad Drake $$






Jim McCauley - aka "Caesar"





Annabeth Karson




Dee McNamara


Bill Maroney









John "Jump" Jordan - JJJ

Larry McNamara

Lynn Anderson

Pals: Dee, Jim and Annabeth

Three Musketeers

Dee and Jim


Atlantean Dennis and Golfviewian JimEx-Mayor Ron Exline and Loser in 2007 District #1 race

Denni$ Dor$sey (Atlantis Resident) has a laugh at the expense of Lake Worth taxpayers.

Definition of Cabal: A cabal is a number of persons united in some close design, usually to promote their private views and interests in a church, state, or other community by intrigue. Cabals are sometimes secret organizations composed of a few designing persons, and at other times are manifestations of Emergence or emergent behavior in society or governance on the part of a community of persons who have well established public affiliation or kinship. The term can also be used to refer to the designs of such persons or to the practical consequences of their emergent behavior, and also holds a general meaning of intrigue and conspiracy. Its usage carries strong connotations of shadowy corners and insidious influence; a cabal is more evil and selective than, say, a faction, which is simply selfish. Because of this negative connotation, few organizations use the term to refer to themselves or their internal subdivisions. Among the exceptions is Discordianism, in which the term is used to refer to an identifiable group within the Discordian tradition.

Main Entry: 1ca·bal
Pronunciation: k&-'bäl, -'bal
Function: noun
Etymology: French cabale cabala, intrigue, cabal, from Medieval Latin cabbala cabala, from Late Hebrew qabbAlAh, literally, received (lore)
1 : the artifices and intrigues of a group of persons secretly united in a plot (as to overturn a government); also : a group engaged in such artifices and intrigues
2 : CLUB, GROUP cabal of artists>
synonym see
PLOT

Above: Artist's interpretation of a Cabal

Lawsuit filed by James McCauley and Laurence McNamara

THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST. IT IS NOT AN ENDORSEMENT OF THE CAUSE.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
JUNE 14, 2007
CONTACT: JANE WEST (561)748-8478

LAKE WORTH CITIZENS DEPRIVED OF VOTE ON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT

Lake Worth, FL – Two citizens of Lake Worth filed suit today against
the City for violating their due process rights. The citizens, James
McCauley and Laurence McNamara, assert that the City of Lake Worth
deprived them of their right to vote on the beach redevelopment
project as required by the referendum that was overwhelmingly approved
by Lake Worth voters in 2004.

Our problem is not with the development so much as is it is with
the process” remarked McCauley, a long time Lake Worth resident.
“We have a strong interest in how our City is developed, that is why
the beach referendum was approved in the first place. Now the City
has by-passed the requirements of that referendum by entering into
this agreement with the developer and that is wrong.”

The referendum requires that the “City owned property east of the
A1A roadway shall not be ….leased, except for a lease of less than
20 years, without the affirmative vote of a majority of the electors
of the City of Lake Worth at a properly noticed and scheduled
referendum.”

“The overriding purpose and intent of this amendment was to give the
residents of Lake Worth a clear and unequivocal voice in how their
valuable publicly owned beach asset would be developed for generations
to come,” observed McNamara. “But then the City entered into a
lease for the unusual term of 19 years, 11 months and 29 days in an
attempt to circumvent the referendum, except when you examine it
closely, it just doesn’t pass muster.”

That failure to pass muster is the crux of the litigation filed with
Palm Beach County. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive
relief. The Plaintiffs have hired the law firms of Collins & West,
P.A. and Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A.

Pass Muster Etymology: based on the military use of the phrase pass muster (= to gather soldiers in a group to show officers they are acceptably dressed and equipped)


Jane West, Esq.
Collins & West, P.A.

Jupiter Office:
10152 W. Indiantown Road, Suite 157
Jupiter, FL 33478
(561)748-8478

Tampa Office:
500 E. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 100
Tampa, FL 33602
(813) 273-9166

www.collins-west.com

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

NOTICE! Announcement regarding the Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan


THE CITY OF LAKE WORTH PLANNING & ZONING BOARD HAS ANNOUNCED THE FIRST OF A SERIES OF MONTHLY SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETINGS AT WHICH THE BOARD WILL REVIEW THE PROPOSED NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAKE WORTH. THE PROPOSED NEW COMP PLAN IMPLEMENTS THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN, ON WHICH THE CITY HAS BEEN WORKING FOR NEARLY TWO YEARS.
TO REVIEW THE STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN, PLEASE CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK:
TO REVIEW THE PROPOSED NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PLEASE CLICK THE FOLLOWING:

CLICK HERE

THE FIRST OF MONTHLY SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD WILL BE HELD BEGINNING AT 6 PM ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 27, 2007 AT THE LW GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE. NO PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN AT THAT TIME. YOU MAY OBSERVE THE PROCEEDINGS. THE P&Z BOARD HAS, HOWEVER, INVITED WRITTEN COMMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. YOUR WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE BOARD PACKAGE FOR THE INITIAL WORKSHOP IF THEY ARE RECEIVED BY CITY STAFF NO LATER THAN 12 NOON ON FRIDAY, JUNE 22, 2007. E-MAIL YOUR COMMENTS TO P&Z DIRECTOR SHARON JACKSON AT sjackson@LakeWorth.org WITH E-MAIL COPY TO BOARD SECRETARY SANDI DUBOSE AT sdubose@LakeWorth.org. YOU MAY ALSO FAX COMMENTS TO MS. JACKSON AT 561-586-1786.
PLEASE ALSO NOTE THAT CONSULTANTS FOR THE CITY ARE NOW PREPARING A COMPLETELY NEW ZONING CODE ("LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS" OR "LDRs") THAT WILL IMPLEMENT THESE CHANGES IN THE COMP PLAN. THE DRAFT LDRs ARE NOT YET AVAILABLE, BUT A DRAFT WILL ALSO BE ADDED TO THIS REVIEW PROCESS IN THE COMING WEEKS.
YOU ARE STRONGLY URGED TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCESS. THE NEW COMP PLAN WILL ESTABLISH THE FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY FOR AT LEAST THE NEXT DECADE. THERE ARE BOTH GOOD AND PROBLEMATIC ELEMENTS TO THE DRAFT. IF YOU OWN LAND WITHIN THE CITY, YOU ARE STRONGLY URGED TO LOOK AT THE PROPOSED NEW FUTURE LAND USE MAP. LARGE AREAS OF THE CITY ARE BEING REDESIGNATED AND WILL EVENTUALLY BE REZONED. THE PROPOSED NEW FUTURE LAND USE MAP IS INCLUDED IN THE "E.A.R. BASED AMENDMENTS", CITED ABOVE. THERE ARE ALSO MANY LIMITS BEING PLACED ON BUILDING HEIGHT, THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS PERMITTED ON A PARCEL OF LAND AND MANY OTHER INCENTIVES/DISINCENTIVES FOR DEVELOPMENT. ONLY YOU CAN DETERMINE HOW THESE CHANGES MAY AFFECT YOU, IF AT ALL.
THE NEW COMP PLAN WILL HAVE A MUCH WIDER AFFECT ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. NOW IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO AFFECT THE OUTCOME OF THIS PROCESS.
WE RECOGNIZE THAT A GREAT DEAL OF EFFORT IS NEEDED TO READ, DIGEST AND COMMENT ON THESE IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS. THIS IS A ONCE-IN-A-DECADE ACTIVITY! WHILE TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE, PLEASE DO NOT PASS UP THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE.
WE EXPECT THE P&Z BOARD'S REVIEW PROCESS TO EXTEND OVER THE NEXT 5-6 MONTHS, AFTER WHICH OUR ATTENTION WILL SHIFT TO ADOPTION OF NEW LAWS BY THE CITY COMMISSION. WE EXPECT THAT THIS NEW FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT WILL BE IN PLACE BY THE END OF THE YEAR.
PLEASE CONTACT ME AT WESBLACKMAN@GMAIL.COM WITH QUESTIONS OR MORE INFORMATION

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Property Tax Reform: View from the Florida Association of Counties

The following letter to Gov. Crist from the Florida Association of Counties provides a good understanding of the challenges facing the legislature which is currently in special session discussing tax reform.

Dear Governor Crist, President Pruitt and Speaker Rubio:

The Florida Association of Counties shares your concern regarding inequities in Florida's current property tax system. While homesteaders receive major tax savings under Save Our Homes, non-homestead properties and businesses that don't benefit from SOH bear the brunt of the tax shift.

Unfortunately, the proposed constitutional amendment released June 8 does not fix these inequities, but actually exacerbates them. Homestead property owners will receive an initial savings that will decrease over time and non-homestead and business property owners are still left paying the tab.

While the proposed statutory cuts will be painful for most counties - and devastating for others - your inclusion of an override option allows local governments to make the decision that is best for their community. We appreciate your nod to home rule and thenotion that local tax and spending decisions should be made by local elected officials, not by Tallahassee.

However, the proposed constitutional changes perpetuate the inequities in Florida's property tax system and will come at great expense to the Florida that our citizens have come to know and love.

We have heard and read the oft-repeated accusation that local governments are using "scare tactics" by warning citizens about the true impacts of dramatic cuts. Please know that your analysis shows the statewide average cut to each county as a result of the proposed rollback and constitutional amendment will be 22.4%.

Of course, Florida's counties will try to hold public safety harmless while imposing revenue reductions this large. But understand the legislation will force many counties to make drastic cuts to quality of life programs - on average at least 60% - or to spread these drastic cuts across all county departments, affecting essential services and public safety.

Perhaps a 60% cut in quality of life programs is acceptable to state leadership but we can assure you that it is not to the communities and people these programs serve.

These cuts impact more than "dog parks", but to many parks around the state. Parks are the fabric of our communities for playgrounds, birthday parties, church picnics and little league.
  • For example, Leon County's national award winning park service would be decimated.
  • Enterprise Florida, Florida's economic development engine, would lose county partners high salaried companies to come to Florida.
  • Public transit systems would be virtually eliminated, crippling our working class and the hospitality industry. Critical roadways - vital to quality of life and better economic development - will likely be delayed or eliminated.
  • Some Health and Human Services are 'non-essential' as well and so the many children, women and elderly helped through preventive programs and social services would be left to fend for themselves or find aid elsewhere. And,
  • Libraries would curtail their hours or close and their literacy programs be eradicated.

Yes, it is conceivable a county could make all of these cuts, but is this what our citizens had in mind when they urged tax relief? We don't think so, and recent polls support our view that Florida residents want property taxes lowered, but not by taking away programs and services they use.

Will the state then shoulder the burden - historically passed onto local governments - and help those who no longer can count on local programs?

Some counties have special districts for fire services, emergency medical personnel and many other things. These districts are funded entirely through ad valorum taxes. With more than 80% of their expenses going to personnel costs, it would be impossible for these special districts to absorb the impacts from this plan without cutting critical emergency personnel.

In addition, if the state promises to hold public schools harmless, how then will the state make up the $1.6 billion loss to school funding? This year alone, the Legislature voted to raise local property taxes for public schools, by $550 million, increasing the Required Local Effort. Will the Legislature address this possible $1.6 billion problem by shifting costs to local governments? Local governments cannot and should not be forced to continue to take on the state's responsibilities.

To put these proposed cuts in perspective, it would be interesting to apply similar cuts to the state. A 22.4 percent cut on the state level would equate to a reduction of $6 billion from the state general revenue fund. Can the state of Florida and the essential services it must provide take this big a hit? We dare say the answer is no, otherwise the state would not continually look to local governments to pick up the state's tab, while bearing the brunt of the state's tax plan.

This plan will create a new Florida, not one for the better but one that erodes our quality of life and public safety while passing on larger savings to property taxpayers who have benefited for years while property values rose. Meanwhile, the property taxpayers paying the most - those who came out to town hall meetings to make impassioned pleas - will continue to bear the brunt of the tax shift.

While we appreciate and agree with the need for comprehensive tax reform, this plan will erode our quality of life, cut essential services and strain public safety - clouding Florida's future economic and social prosperity.

Sincerely,

Commissioner Susan Latvala, President
Commissioner Teresa Jacobs, President-Elect