Click here for more information.
May 26th, 4:30 p.m.
Location
Barton Elementary School is located at:
1700 Barton Rd., Lake Worth, FL 33460
Directions: I-95 to Lantana Rd. East to Andrew Redding Rd. North on Andrew Redding Rd.
School on west side of Andrew Redding Rd.
Friday, May 18, 2012
Thursday, May 17, 2012
From a concerned reader regarding a "Revival" on Lucerne and D Street:
"Wes,
I don't know what your plans are tonight , but we have a new development in front of the Quick Stop on Lucerne Ave. For about 5 weeks now, a group of black men in long white robes, trimmed in red, wearing a star of David around their necks have been preaching loudly to anyone who will listen. They claim Jesus was really black.(They only show up on Thursday nights at 8:30pm). We are uncomfortable with the situation. I'm attaching the flyer we received from them. I did speak with Commissioner Amoroso about this."
Click here for flyer - no endorsement intended, just provided as information. Anyone know more about this? This is the Kwik Stop at Lucerne and D.
I don't know what your plans are tonight , but we have a new development in front of the Quick Stop on Lucerne Ave. For about 5 weeks now, a group of black men in long white robes, trimmed in red, wearing a star of David around their necks have been preaching loudly to anyone who will listen. They claim Jesus was really black.(They only show up on Thursday nights at 8:30pm). We are uncomfortable with the situation. I'm attaching the flyer we received from them. I did speak with Commissioner Amoroso about this."
Click here for flyer - no endorsement intended, just provided as information. Anyone know more about this? This is the Kwik Stop at Lucerne and D.
2 Lake Worth homes built with federal grant money to be dedicated
More evidence that the CRA is where it is at when it comes to getting things done in Lake Worth. Click title for link to article/announcement.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
No surprise here...
From Channel 12's FaceBook page comes this:
Do not think that this was not a tool used in previous elections. This was one of the targets of the massive volunteer poll-watching effort this last election here in Lake Worth.
It seems Florida has thousands of dead people listed as voters. State officials checked Social Security files and concluded that 53-thousand people who died were still registered to vote. The Department of State says election supervisors have seven days to remove the deceased voters. What do you think about this?
Do not think that this was not a tool used in previous elections. This was one of the targets of the massive volunteer poll-watching effort this last election here in Lake Worth.
Manalapan/South Palm Beach: Targets of lawsuit could do better than anticipated - The Coastal Star
From the Coastal Star, we learn of more fallout from the best-city-manager/commission-ever. From the article:
Manalapan and South Palm Beach town officials think they may emerge smelling like a rose from a dispute with the city of Lake Worth over payments for the operation of a regional sewer system.
In August 2010, Lake Worth sued its seven municipal partners in the regional system — including Manalapan, South Palm Beach and Lantana — claiming it was owed $7 million for operation and maintenance of the system, dating back years. Palm Beach, Palm Springs, Atlantis and Palm Beach State College also are being sued.
A consultant hired by the seven entities thinks Manalapan may have overpaid by $12,000 rather than underpaid, Town Manager Linda Stumpf said.
“That hasn’t been presented to Lake Worth. That’s just our calculation,’’ Stumpf told Manalapan commissioners. “But we’ve believed from the beginning that the numbers that they’ve come up with are excessive.’’
Click title for link to entire article. I wish the blog passed out tissues sometimes.
Manalapan and South Palm Beach town officials think they may emerge smelling like a rose from a dispute with the city of Lake Worth over payments for the operation of a regional sewer system.
In August 2010, Lake Worth sued its seven municipal partners in the regional system — including Manalapan, South Palm Beach and Lantana — claiming it was owed $7 million for operation and maintenance of the system, dating back years. Palm Beach, Palm Springs, Atlantis and Palm Beach State College also are being sued.
A consultant hired by the seven entities thinks Manalapan may have overpaid by $12,000 rather than underpaid, Town Manager Linda Stumpf said.
“That hasn’t been presented to Lake Worth. That’s just our calculation,’’ Stumpf told Manalapan commissioners. “But we’ve believed from the beginning that the numbers that they’ve come up with are excessive.’’
Click title for link to entire article. I wish the blog passed out tissues sometimes.
View All Photos < America's Happiest Seaside Towns - Coastal Living
Lake Worth didn't make the list - but Jupiter is #9. I guess "resiliency" doesn't equal happiness. Click title for link to list, pictures and how the communities were chosen.
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Study of West Palm Beach's south end leaves officials flat
I am disappointed that the report apparently - I will get a copy of it - left out the importance of US 1 in the area's early development and mid-Twentieth century prosperity. The report dealt with challenges and solutions for South Dixie Hwy. Much more could be done to celebrate this history. And the board that is formed here should include interests from Lake Worth - for continuity and regional cooperation. Click title for link to article.
High expectations?
When I hear some people talk about how the new casino at the beach will be a major economic jolt to our downtown, it seems like they have this sort of image in mind. I think some of the city's financial projections anticipate this.
This just is not going to happen. The building is smaller than the old one, will basically have the same mix of tenants, etc. By the way, this image I stumbled upon while on FaceBook - it is Ft. Lauderdale Beach during a late 1970s/early 1980s Spring Break.
This just is not going to happen. The building is smaller than the old one, will basically have the same mix of tenants, etc. By the way, this image I stumbled upon while on FaceBook - it is Ft. Lauderdale Beach during a late 1970s/early 1980s Spring Break.
Mango May Meeting this Thursday
Hello all Mango Groves Neighbors and Friends,
Just a reminder that we are having our May Neighborhood Association meeting at 7pm this Thursday, May 17, 2012 at Compass on Dixie and 2nd Ave North.
All are welcome. Robert Waples will be there to tell us about Neighbors Helping Neighbors Project and Paint Your Heart Out. He is a favorite and valued member of our community, as well as a truly kind and generous soul. PBSO will be there to give us an update of what's going on in our neighborhood. We will discuss the 4th of July weekend Annual Grunge Raft Race Committee Plans and the Neighborhood Olympics to be held this year in conjunction with the opening of the 2012 Summer Games in London.
We look forward to seeing you there!
Just a reminder that we are having our May Neighborhood Association meeting at 7pm this Thursday, May 17, 2012 at Compass on Dixie and 2nd Ave North.
All are welcome. Robert Waples will be there to tell us about Neighbors Helping Neighbors Project and Paint Your Heart Out. He is a favorite and valued member of our community, as well as a truly kind and generous soul. PBSO will be there to give us an update of what's going on in our neighborhood. We will discuss the 4th of July weekend Annual Grunge Raft Race Committee Plans and the Neighborhood Olympics to be held this year in conjunction with the opening of the 2012 Summer Games in London.
We look forward to seeing you there!
Lake Worth to consider $850K settlement with power co-op
I wonder if our electric rates will reflect this windfall, if the City Commission approves the settlement offer. And can we please find out the "net" figure - settlement less costs to defend the city's position. I am sure the number would be much smaller. Click title for link to article.
Monday, May 14, 2012
Who knew?
Russ' question about who the architect of my house was led me to do some Internet sleuthing. I remember trying to chase down information before regarding the architect in the title block - soon after I bought the house, but could find nothing. I just thought he was a forgotten Miami architect that drew post WW II house designs.
Well, I stumbled on to the City of Miami Beach designation report for their Ocean Beach historic district. For those of you that know Miami Beach, it is the area generally south of the causeway and home of Joe's Stone Crabs. The architect indicated on the set of plans that I have is Carlos B. Schoeppl, who is identified in their report as one of the "master architects" of the district.
So, my house may have a bit of a pedigree, but to what degree is the question due to the differences between the plan and the actual construction of the house. All of these factors for properties within the College Park, and other historic districts, should be considered when the districts are re-surveyed. Which is being planned out - probably taking place years hence. Right now, my house is considered "non-contributing" based on the survey done in 1998 - it was not yet 50 years old at that point in time - which is usually the threshold for historic significance. Nothing was noted regarding its architect and the wrong built date is given in the survey.
Click here for more information on Carlos B. Schoeppl - thanks Russ!
Anyway, I hope you find this interesting and thanks for the indulgence.
Well, I stumbled on to the City of Miami Beach designation report for their Ocean Beach historic district. For those of you that know Miami Beach, it is the area generally south of the causeway and home of Joe's Stone Crabs. The architect indicated on the set of plans that I have is Carlos B. Schoeppl, who is identified in their report as one of the "master architects" of the district.
So, my house may have a bit of a pedigree, but to what degree is the question due to the differences between the plan and the actual construction of the house. All of these factors for properties within the College Park, and other historic districts, should be considered when the districts are re-surveyed. Which is being planned out - probably taking place years hence. Right now, my house is considered "non-contributing" based on the survey done in 1998 - it was not yet 50 years old at that point in time - which is usually the threshold for historic significance. Nothing was noted regarding its architect and the wrong built date is given in the survey.
Click here for more information on Carlos B. Schoeppl - thanks Russ!
Anyway, I hope you find this interesting and thanks for the indulgence.
My house has a fraternal twin...
Northwood Shores - WPB |
Over the years, I didn't think much about it. I did, soon after I purchased my home, chase down a set of the original house plans in the city's property file for my address. If you are interested in the history of your house - from various permits to the original plans or plans for an addition, you may be surprised to know the city can provide a lot of information for you. There are missing periods due to a fire and of course some questionable record keeping practices over the years, but for the most part the records are intact - and they happened to be in that condition for my house. I had the plans sent out to a printer and have had the two sheets framed. They hang in two different parts of the house.
Northwood Shores - WPB |
The differences might be due to the fact that my house was initially started for one buyer and somewhere along the way that deal might have fallen part. According to the information that I have been able to put together, the house was finished in the early part of 1951, but not occupied until 1952. The first house owner's name does not match the name indicated on the plans.
For whatever reason, there are things that are part of the built house in WPB that are not on mine. The plan shows two chimneys - the WPB home has one, mine has none.
College Park - LW |
College Park - LW |
Northwood Shores - WPB |
College Park - LW |
Northwood Shores - WPB |
College Park - LW |
Northwood Shores - WPB |
College Park - LW |
It is also revealing that these two homes were built in these two neighborhoods around the same time. Both were considered nice places to live, with the Northwood area of WPB having known to be inhabited by many doctors since the neighborhood was between two hospitals.
Bill and I used this as a destination for a bike excursion this weekend. I was able to talk to an across the street neighbor and left a message on the homeowner's voicemail. I haven't heard back from him - maybe he thought I was casing the joint or something. But I would like to get a chance to look around inside and see what other differences there are between the two.
One thing that I would like to check out is whether or not the ceiling in the living room of the WPB house is anything like this. This was a big selling point for me when I saw it and those that visit always comment on the beamed ceiling.
I called the WPB Historic Preservation office this morning and asked if they had any information on this house. They did not. It is not currently in a historic district - it begins west of Poinsettia - this property is east in Northwood Shores. They also didn't have the usual "green card" for the property - which is a little odd. It would be interesting to know how closely chronologically they were built.
I'll let you know what I find out.
Interesting historic factoids...
Thumbing through the College Park Historic District designation report, I found the following reference about Lake Worth and West Palm Beach once could have become one city. See below:
And College Park was platted and lots were sold prior to it being officially in the city of Lake Worth. Here is some more on this early period...
And I had no idea that success was the born child of progress!
And College Park was platted and lots were sold prior to it being officially in the city of Lake Worth. Here is some more on this early period...
And I had no idea that success was the born child of progress!
Wes Blackman Volunteer Board Application May 2012
FYI - thought you'd like to take a look at my application for the HRPB or P&Z. The interviews will be happening June 25th and 26th, beginning at 5:30 p.m. Click title for link.
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Filling out City board appointment application...
At last week's Historic Resource Preservation Board (HRPB) meeting, we were told by staff that each one of the four existing board members would have to re-apply this year, regardless of the end date of our term. This is due to the continued reformation of both the Planning and Zoning (P&Z) and HRPB - adjusting the number of voting members and alternates for both (5 and 2, respectively) and making sure that at least a majority of those on each board have some sort of professional expertise in the work areas of each board. Essentially, the city wants to start with a clean slate, based on these standards. This re-formulation is also setting the foundation for implementation of the 7 1/2 year delay in getting new land development regulations. But that is another story.
The City Commission temporarily re-appointed existing members of each board until new members are selected late in June. During that process, Mr. McNamara resigned from P&Z and Ms. Jennings lost her seat on the same board. So, what this all means is that all five voting positions are up for grabs on both boards, along with the two alternate positions. The applications have to be made by May 25th.
So, to get my application out of the way, I went to the city's website where I found the application under Volunteer Boards. On the page where the link is, there is an indication that it was last revised on May 9th - recent enough that it should contain all pertinent and up-to-date information. Well, guess what...it doesn't.
Here is what it says about the vacancy status on the HRPB:
The above description still reflects a seven person voting board, not five (there are four remaining members) and it does not reflect the fact that there are really 7 vacancies - five regular members and two alternates)
The P&Z log on the city's website shows a board of seven members, all with full voting powers (update in January 2012). The alternate positions (formerly two) were eliminated immediately prior to Ms. Jennings being appointed to the board. We wouldn't want a former city commissioner having to sit as a usually non-voting member of this board - especially the one that controls height! Hmmm... Anyway, the application currently says that three members are needed on P&Z, when in fact five regular members are needed, along with two alternates.
When will the information that the city is responsible for putting out be relevant, current and actually reflect the truth? I have yet to see it done on a consistent basis. I am hopeful that this is one of the changes our new city manager can initiate.
The City Commission temporarily re-appointed existing members of each board until new members are selected late in June. During that process, Mr. McNamara resigned from P&Z and Ms. Jennings lost her seat on the same board. So, what this all means is that all five voting positions are up for grabs on both boards, along with the two alternate positions. The applications have to be made by May 25th.
So, to get my application out of the way, I went to the city's website where I found the application under Volunteer Boards. On the page where the link is, there is an indication that it was last revised on May 9th - recent enough that it should contain all pertinent and up-to-date information. Well, guess what...it doesn't.
Here is what it says about the vacancy status on the HRPB:
The above description still reflects a seven person voting board, not five (there are four remaining members) and it does not reflect the fact that there are really 7 vacancies - five regular members and two alternates)
The P&Z log on the city's website shows a board of seven members, all with full voting powers (update in January 2012). The alternate positions (formerly two) were eliminated immediately prior to Ms. Jennings being appointed to the board. We wouldn't want a former city commissioner having to sit as a usually non-voting member of this board - especially the one that controls height! Hmmm... Anyway, the application currently says that three members are needed on P&Z, when in fact five regular members are needed, along with two alternates.
When will the information that the city is responsible for putting out be relevant, current and actually reflect the truth? I have yet to see it done on a consistent basis. I am hopeful that this is one of the changes our new city manager can initiate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)