Click title for link to PB Post article. I was able to hear most of the meeting over the Internet while working yesterday morning - missed a little bit of the end. It seems to be a reasonable solution to an unfortunate problem - having to do more improvements to the building than originally anticipated due to deferred or no maintenance by the City or the County - and triggering 2008 code compliance due to exceeding 33% of the building's value.
Much blame was heaped upon officials that are no longer with the City, so they couldn't defend themselves.
Overall, this represents a sound solution to a complex set of circumstances.