With all this talk about city buildings and their future use, it got me thinking that Song and Associates did a study on utilization, condition and future facility needs for the city not too long ago. I was able to find the Phase I report, but am having trouble tracking down the Phase II report. If any one has luck finding it, forward it to me and I will create a link to it. I forwarded the Phase I report to Ms. Stanton. While realizing her disdain for the past, if she hasn't seen this report, she should read it. I believe the Phase II report recommended that the current City Hall is best suited for use as a library.
You can see that the City Manager is looking at having the City Hall Annex building house the library - thinking that it is a "great" building for it. According to the Phase I report, the architects found the Annex to be in poor condition with a great deal of damage from wood-eating insects and general rot. The report also goes into a square footage analysis about the ultimate size of a library for a city the size of Lake Worth. They recommended that a building three times the size would be ideal for our library.
What would the current library building be used for if not for a library? It is landlocked by other buildings so expansion isn't possible. It is most definitely historic and probably eligible for an individual listing on the National Register. It gets a little scary that we are a city in a state of "financial urgency" and the future of the library building may be in limbo.
I remember the uproar when the Lucerne had to eliminate the windows on the east side of the building due to the proximity of the property and the possibility of a future building being built on the library property. This was caused by the building code and fire safety considerations. But the conspiracy theorists, especially at election time, wove a tall tale about how this meant that the library building was soon to be demolished. How strange that those holding the cards now might just propose that. It would be a terrible mistake. Perhaps some sort of adaptive re-use would be possible?