And another thing...

The irony is not lost on me that suddenly the amount of retail space on the beach property and how much the city wants might be at odds with the land use and zoning designation.  I know the Beach and Casino future land use designation was repealed as part of the last Comprehensive Plan submission, but I am not sure if the zoning changed back.  If not, the land use is inconsistent with the zoning and the zoning district has to be changed too.  If the building size increases, then we may be increasing the size of a non-conforming building - which you can't do - supposedly.   Then we are back to a point in time before the other land use and zoning change that everyone thought would "over-commercialize" the beach.

Is it possible to be any more consistently inconsistent?