data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26b1f/26b1f3b48defd468ed233626e85e136e241c3e12" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c263/0c263a062a0940c1f6d11f80142a1e29b9c3b44b" alt=""
If you read the article, you'll know that Mr. Lang, Sr. has no interest in the business now. It was run by his family as a bar for many years and the attorney representing Mojito's is going back to him for his recollection on their hours of operation - back when. Other than being a member of the family that formerly owned the business - back when, the principal with the Sunset property has no tie to this property. This doesn't stop the blogger from using the son's picture and tie-in with the Sunset property as evidence of some dark "good old boy" conspiracy.
This is a good example of the type of fiction offered as truth told at many a doorstep during campaign season.