Thursday, May 26, 2011

Special City Commission Meeting Today (5/26) - 1 p.m. -

I plan on attending this afternoon and will attempt to keep you posted in real time.  Click title for access to complete back-up.

First thing, the agenda of the meeting was amended and an item to "Increase the Allowable Heights in the Park of Commerce" was put on the agenda as Item A.  Maxwell made the motion and it passed before Commissioner McVoy showed up.  Public comment was allowed but everyone stayed seated.  My only comment was that I was in favor of it, but other areas of the city need to be examined as well.  Stanton was directed to come back to the City Commission later on.  The question one has to ask is why now?  And it has always been represented to the public that the 35 foot height limitation did not apply to the Park of Commerce.  So, the truth comes out.

Steve Carr is giving a presentation on the 2nd Quarter budget projection.
This is the overall picture.  McVoy is asking if there is a standard by which cities are graded if they are within a certain range of their budget projections.  Carr says that the recommended reserves are 10 to 15 percent - as a standard and that we are far away from that.  Mulvehill comments about the special election - the cost is $22,500 according to Pam Lopez - the run-off would be an equal amount.  She thinks it's great that Finance is able to provide projections.  Maxwell is asking if Fry, the OMB Director, is going to be here to day.  He is not.

Maxwell - double digit variances are not close by each line item.  This second quarter forecast is a year total number not just a three month or a six month number. He is asking about the City Attorney's line item.

The cost of outside attorneys is in that line item.  He is now asking about the $15.4 million line item for the "Police" and is concerned that it reflects an amount higher than the contract.  Part of the reason is due to a supplemental payment that will be expiring in the next two years.  He says that he has never talked to the City Manager about this.  Carr says that the pension obligation (basis for the supplemental payment) relates to fire rescue and not PBSO. After all is said and done that the amount of that is $1.544 million obligation this year and it is going up next year.  These are old pension obligations.  There are $177,000 on the utilities in the building they are using as well - and $43,000 for maintenance.  McVoy is talking about a botany term "Splitters and Lumpers."

The auditors just got here (1:40 p.m.) - they are still discussing the 2nd quarter projection. 

Maxwell is now asking about fire rescue now - the city has only made two supplemental payments and needs to make four.  Carr says that they determined that they didn't have all the money, only half.  There is money in the hurricane fund that it is not reflected here.  Maxwell is commenting on layoffs - he is saying that the budget was adopted with the understanding that it was adopted without requiring layoffs - but there were.  He is asking could the city have budgeted for that as of October 1, 2010 and could we have waited until 2012?  Carr says yes, but you would have had to pay them through the entire period of this year.  He is having a problem with the Commission saying that layoffs would not be needed - Stanton says that at that time, she said that there would have to be adjustments in 60 days - meaning cuts in the labor cuts.  Maxwell insists that we do not have a balanced budget - Stanton says that is factually incorrect.  Maxwell says that we had a document that added up, but it was not balance.  Stanton got a little hot about that.  She says that we had $840,000 in the positive - even better than balanced.  She says that we are acting today to address a predicted shortfall in FY 2012.  She says to address the charges of a "flawed" budget to the auditor and see what they said.  Mulvehill asks to go on with the agenda and get off the topic.  

Building permit fund - it's doing better than it is since the city is paying permit fees for the beach project (which is one pocket from another.) 

I'm back - they are on the donations item.  Maxwell is asking if any of the "special events" funding for fireworks for this year since up until now it has been assumed we wouldn't be funding them.  Joe Kroll says that it is too late for this year already, but we could plan for next year.  McVoy asks if we could push.  Maxwell says that "There isn't try, only do."

On the golf course, it still is not making money and there is a multi-year plan coming forward in the next six weeks.  McVoy made a point about environmental programs lacking and that we need to - the golf course folks said that they have joined the Audubon.  Mulvehill actually mentioned my name as it relates to the idea about expanding the walk along the Intracoastal further to the north - from several years ago. 

They are finishing up comments on the second quarter projections (3:15 p.m.) - I took notes on the document that I will make later, time permitting.

Now is the audit presentation - and they are just being passed out now to the Commission.  They are referring to a PowerPoint presentation - they are late due to a power outage and they don't have facilities in Lake Worth. They are pointing out the following is an accomplishment.
They issued it with an unqualified opinion. It was overall a glowing report that the bobble heads seemed to like.  It is available on CD and I will pick up a copy - you can too.  Apparently, it will be available at City Hall and at the Library.  Maxwell makes an issue of the lateness of the report and that it was delivered today, not in advance of the meeting.  He is saying that the report is inconclusive, but they are saying that there is improvement.  He is asking how much improved is the question.  There is a deadline of May 31st that you must adhere to in order to get a certificate.  The federal OMB deadline, since the city receives federal money, is June 30th.  McVoy is making the point that we do not need an internal auditor - we don't need an auditor auditing an auditor.  Maxwell is making a point that they haven't had time to review and if it is just so that the city can get an award is a bad precedent.  He says that we are talking not about style, but substance.  He can physically accept it, but has a problem with accepting the content without the time to review it.  Carr is saying that the audit was essentially done on March 31st but they needed to address some of the fixed asset issues identified in previous years.  They were able to address more items than they otherwise would have.  Accountants don't fly by the seat of their pants, according to Commissioner McVoy.  Maxwell will be voting against this today.

Carr is going over the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and a Citizen's version, which is condensed and easier to understand. 

McVoy pointed out something, which is really very obvious, that the city benefits from all the cash that is generated from the utility.  Carr responds that if someone else owned our electric utility, we would get increased revenue from property taxes on assets of that utility and we could still levy a franchise tax - which would increase revenues from those sources.  But we would be giving control away and that would be a bad thing - besides having the ability to move things around.  Mary Lindsey points out that this Citizen's report was not available at the joint meeting between the FAB and City Commission and it's available today - she wonders how this Commission expects to have the trust of the citizens without this sort of information.  Stanton says they work like dogs around here.
Break time.